The Hidden Challenges of Becoming a CLA Coach in Submission Grappling (And Why You Should Do It Anyway)
- battlefieldsbjj
- 4 days ago
- 4 min read
By someone who has fumbled through every stage of this and somehow come out the other side… mostly intact.
If you’re a grappling coach considering the Constraints-Led Approach, there’s something you need to hear straight up:
Your biggest obstacle in the beginning won’t be the athletes. It won’t be your gym. It won’t even be the method. It’ll be you.
Yep. Your own insecurities, doubts, habits, and perfectionism.
I know because I went through all of it. Every phase. Every cringe moment. Every “what the hell am I doing?” spiral. And I’m telling you right now — it’s normal.
Below are the real challenges you’ll face as a CLA-based coach entering the submission-grappling world, and how to get through them without losing your mind or your membership base.
1. The First Roadblock: Your Own Fear of Implementing It
Here’s the truth nobody told me early on: CLA doesn’t feel natural to implement. It feels like stepping off a cliff and trusting that gravity will be kind this one time.
When you’re used to teaching sequences, steps, cues, and pre-packaged “do A, then B, then C” answers, switching to an ecological framework feels wrong — like you’re not teaching.
Your brain will sabotage you. “Are you sure?” “This looks sloppy.” “They’re not learning anything.” “What if someone asks a question I can’t answer?” “What if everything falls apart?” “What if I’m wrong?”
That fear is so strong that most coaches never get past it. They intellectually “like the idea” of CLA, but that’s where it ends. They go:
“Yeah nah, too hard. I’ll stick to what I know.”
And that’s a shame, because the only way through the uncertainty is through it.
2. Where Most Coaches Get Stuck: “I Don’t Know Where to Start”
This is the second major challenge: starting.
Most coaches want to get into CLA but overcomplicate the entry point. They think they need the perfect design, the perfect game, the perfect progression, the perfect language. They want a textbook before they’ve even stepped into the laboratory.
But here’s what I tell people now:
My first six months of CLA coaching were a beautiful disaster.
I was trying to force throws to emerge. Trying to force sweeps to emerge. Trying to force entries to emerge. Trying to force whatever CAL, Jones, or Preet had said into my athletes’ bodies as neatly as they said it on YouTube.
It was clumsy. It was messy. And honestly? I’d look back at some of those early sessions and cringe my face off.
But here’s the key:
They were necessary.
Because I learned from them.
Every “failed” session taught me more than any seminar ever could. Every awkward attempt improved my understanding. Every weird game design sharpened my eye for the sport.
So if you’re stuck on “where do I start?” — start anywhere.
Start messy. Start clunky. Start with games that barely resemble what you intended. Start with something that makes you rethink your life choices later.
Just start.
3. Adopt a Scientific Process (This Saved My Sanity)
Here’s how I survived (and improved):
Write down what you planned. Even if it’s rough.
Record sessions. Even if the camera angle sucks.
Rewatch. Even if it’s painful.
Talk out loud—to a camera, a mirror, a wall, whatever.
Reflect honestly. What worked? What didn’t?
Don’t rate yourself as a coach. Rate the session’s outcome, its alignment with your intention, and what information you gained.
What you’re doing is building your own personal coaching dataset.
You start to see patterns. You start to understand affordances. You start to spot design flaws instantly. You start recognising the hidden variables in each session.
And suddenly — you realise you’re improving.
4. You Will Get Pushback From Your Members
This challenge is unavoidable: People will resist the change.
Some will hate it immediately. Some will quietly disengage. Some will leave.
And the reasons vary:
“I don’t feel like I’m learning.”
“This isn’t how we did it at my old gym.”
“Can’t you just show me the move?”
“Why do your answers sound like riddles?”
“Why are we playing games again?”
“I just want the technique.”
Early on, this hits you hard because you’re already insecure about what you’re doing. When someone questions you, it feels like confirmation that you're screwing it all up.
For me, in the early days, I didn’t yet have the experience to confidently select the right coaching intervention for the individual, the moment, the athlete’s goal, and the problem in front of them. So instead, I would just… give them another game. That was my only tool at the time.
Now, with more experience, I’ve developed a much more nuanced feel for when to:
change the task
exaggerate a constraint
remove a constraint
use an analogy
ask a clarifying question
shift the goal
add variability
go narrower
go wider
or sometimes, yeah, give them a short technical cue because it fits the moment
But that took time. And reps. And a lot of humble pie.
5. How to Reduce the Pushback (But Not Avoid It Entirely)
Some coaches before me handled this perfectly: They simply told their members:
“Hey guys, we’re going to try something new.”
And because their members trusted them, that permission carried them through the initial turbulence.
If you’re switching a whole club over, you need buy-in.
If you’re starting from scratch, you need patience.
And in both cases, you need thick skin.
6. Final Thoughts: You’re Going to Feel Lost Before You Feel Competent
This approach doesn’t reward instant gratification. It rewards persistence, curiosity, and honest reflection.
You will second-guess yourself. You will design games that flop harder than a white belt in closed guard. You will feel like the room doesn’t trust you. You will feel “less coach-like” for months.
But then one day, it clicks.
You start seeing your athletes develop real, adaptable skill. Not memorised moves. Not fragile patterns. Not “technique collectors.”
But true, functional grappling ability.
And you’ll know — without doubt — that all the awkward months were worth it.



Comments